New York Times reported about a Canadian Ruling on Web Music in Canada last week. It goes something like this:
"Downloading copyrighted music from peer-to-peer networks is legal in Canada, although uploading files is not, Canadian copyright regulators said yesterday.
In the same decision, the Copyright Board of Canada imposed a government fee of as much as $25 on iPod-like MP3 players, putting the devices in the same category as audio tapes and blank compact discs. The money collected from levies goes into a fund to pay musicians and songwriters for revenue lost from personal copying. Manufacturers are responsible for paying the fees and often pass the cost on to consumers.
The peer-to-peer component of the decision was prompted by questions from consumer and entertainment groups about ambiguous elements of Canadian law. Previously, most analysts had said uploading was illegal but that downloading for personal use might be allowed. "
Note the last line - does that sound like the marihuana law in Canada? Well, smoking for personal use and thus buying for personal use is legal... but selling is illegal... ahem... This, however, misses some important parts of the peer-to-peer protocol. On most things, whatever you happen to download, becomes instantly available as a download to other users. So... ummm... if downloading is legal and uploading is illegal, but that action is, essentially, one and the same, how will uhhhhh the legal system deal with this quandary? Just another example of the profound detachment of legislature from reality... ouchie
No comments:
Post a Comment