25 September, 2005
Rita preliminiary damage reports
20 September, 2005
Katrina-related links
Allegheny County Emergency Services Hurricane Katrina relief
National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Natural Hazards Center
American Red Cross Hurricane Katrina Resources
Wikipedia - general info page Hurricane Katrina
Katrina Help: Disaster recovery wiki
Dinha Mehta's Katrina Help Blog
19 September, 2005
FCC plans $211M to rebuild communications
New Orleans rebuilt as a beacon of high technology?
Yet I take issue with "we will earmark some money to provide poor families with access". Well that's nice, but access is not the same as having the hardware and the know-how to access. It's not going just going to take money for the poor population of NO to suddenly "get on the Internet" and "get connected" It's going to take educational centers, donations of hardware (refirbished computers for example), volunteer tech support centers. It's going to take equipping every school in the area with state of the art technology so that every child has access at least while they are at school. It's nice to talk about "earmarking some money" but how much? and where is it going to go?
The last bit in the article is the best A. Townsend quote I've heard to date (I am becoming a bit of groupie I think ;): He pointed out that all of these "hi tech" "infrastructureless" ideas are good and great, but the main reason most of the communication infrastructures failed in NO this time was not because they were broken themselves, it was because ELECTRICITY went out. As long as everything we build relies on the traditional electrical grid that can go down when an employee mixes the wires, let alone when a hurricain hits and a city floods, no matter what we build, it will still shut off. We must change the way we think about infrastructure at a very basic level - water, power, trash. Only then would we be able to build something truly innovative. At that point, we also must think about making that something innovative truly accessible to all.
15 September, 2005
this makes me want to scream... very loudly
AddieStan
After several meetings, exchanges of emails, talking... I am getting a sense that technologists around me seem to think they can save the world if only they could put all this information online and streamline it... It makes me want to crumple on the floor, roll up in a ball when the "large research proposal" PI's are interested in the "Internet response" - the person-location web-sites and the "look to see if your house is ok" websites...
I want to say - but there are people there, they are hurt, and we don't know how to help them best right now (aside from horrible horrible aweful government inpetitude) - we could, we really could provide something to ease the pain and suffering of those who lost it ALL, who don't HAVE A COMPUTER ANYMORE! and maybe never had it either! We need to understand how people cope with this thing because we only vaguely know how they could potentially do that - we have never seen anything like this happen here, in this country, let alone actually study it. Why study it? because then we can have better answers for what is needed, for how to build services and infrastructures to help these people and those in the future. The help, what the red-head psychologist writes about, the initial response is something that is necessary and the general inadequacy of this response will haunt us for years to come. Yet what will also haunt is that adjustment to this disaster for the victims, the "getting over it" is not going to happen soon - this will take years.
Those years, when Red Cross help is not available anymore, when the kindness of strangers and even friends trickles to nothing, but the monsters of water, stench, disease, lost friends, relatives, pets, will haunt the dreams, will haunt the memories. We need this research now so that we can set up long term support. We need it, so that we can understand things now and help people over the course of time, time that will heal wounds and time that it will take to rebuild half a million lives.
13 September, 2005
In Close Quarters, a Moment's Peace Is Rare
The human tragedy of shelters as transient spaces not designed to live in, just to wait in, have been finding their way into the media. in a certain way, it is impressive just how well these things are currently run and how many people volunteer. It is also impressive just how crowded these spaces have to be right now because there are so many people displaced. This overcrowding makes for a tough time, requiring a lot of patience from people who have been torn away from all they had, from people they knew, from everything familiar, and plunged in the middle of another version of a minor human hell.
More pet links
Animal Refuge Strives to Corral Pets -- and Despair - Los Angeles Times
First Coast News | Top Stories - Local Man Rescues Pets in New Orleans
Dallas Morning News | News for Dallas, Texas | Katrina's Aftermath
more links - probably the most striking thing here is that neither Red Cross nor FEMA were set up to deal with pets and have even had to refuse rescue to people who wanted to take their pets along. considering the emotional bond with pets that owners develop, forcing people to leave their pets behind is making their road to recovery that much longer and harder. While officials dubbed those who wouldn't leave their pets behind as "crazy" or "dumb" other pet owners certainly understood. For some, while it's not quite like leaving your children or relatives behind, it's certainly pretty close.
SignOnSanDiego.com > News > Nation -- Uniting pets, families is an emotional task
Cingular, Sprint give Katrina victims bill breaks | CNET News.com
The trendsetter Verizon seems to lag behind on the generosity bit. They also don't seem to have set up any large donations as Sprint and Cingular did over the last two weeks. Of course, it could be they are simply humble and are not disclosing their charitable acitivities... could be, no really... hmmm naaaah.
12 September, 2005
Southern Co. unit operations restored
Wireless carriers are making progress restoring service to areas hit by Hurricane Katrina. Sprint Nextel as of yesterday had restored nearly all service in Alabama, more than 80% in Mississippi and more than 60% in Louisiana. Verizon Wireless said it has restored 300 of the 400 cell sites put out of service by the storm, while T-Mobile announced service is running at nearly all of its sites. Cingular Wireless reported it has 75% service in the region, and SouthernLINC Wireless said it has brought back 100% service in Alabama, Georgia, Florida and Mississippi.
Southern Co. unit operations restored
USATODAY.com - Some areas inch toward normality
Cingular restores 75 percent of service in hurricane zone - 2005-09-09
Carriers Boost Efforts to Restore Service to Gulf Coast
Wired links on Wireless activity in NO - Katrina aftermath
Acting on an emergency request from the American Red Cross, the FCC on Friday handed over control of the toll-free number 1-800-RED-CROSS to the nonprofit group, unceremoniously plucking it from the hands of corporate digit-squatters who'd been hoping for a six-figure payday. Wired News: Red Cross Gets Squatter's Number
About 8000 wireless ISPs are standing at the ready, prepared to provide voice over IP service to relief shelters around the country, at the direction of the Federal Communications Commission. Wireless ISPs ready to heed call for help “They are trying to show alternative methods to the traditional way of doing things,” he said. “We can do this so more rapidly than the cellphone technologies. I’m not trying to indicate that those guys are less worthy. I’m just saying here’s an alternative – we can do it fast.” One Part-15 member is already provide communications to about 11 shelters north of New Orleans that were hastily assembled to give the hoards of people fleeing the city a place to be and the ability to communicate with their families, Anderson said.
--the last one in this batch is really neat - throughout the relief efforts it has become clear that newer technologies are more flexible and are capable of providing immediate support where older technologies fail. However, the question remains - which of these technologies are capable of withstanding the brunt of the disaster as well? so far experience has shown that landlines, buried deep in the ground survived the onslaught better than wireless towers, yet disruptions that did occur for landlines have been far harder to remedy.
22 August, 2005
Segregated Saudis Utilize Bluetooth for Flirtations
Technology strikes again at the monoliths of social etiquette. The very discreetness of the medium and ability to control who sees communications and why, allows women take dating into their own hands, in countries where such actions are strictly forbidden... You go girls :)
Wireless Phone Virus Contaminates Helsinki Championships
Hmm just like with email - if it's an odd message trying to download itself to your phone, don't push the "ok" button. Just like email, I have no doubts that most people will still push the "ok" button, probably overcome with curiosity... Phone viruses have arrived.
21 August, 2005
File Share and Share Alike - BitTorrent used for legal purposes (gasp!)
Over the last decade, the "culture industry" looked like a dinasaur who refused to die, and cobbled onlookers in it's death-throws. Nobody had warned it that the rules were about to change, and, when the rules changed, the "culture industry" just didn't want to play by them. Instead of harnessing the energy of early tech adopters, who, incidentally, were also it's biggest fans, it decided to persecute them and use fear-mongering tactics. It didn't work, although it did spurr a form of an arms race between the lawyers and the tech developers. It was stunning that the largest behemoth's of the "culture industry" did not immediately realize the marketing potential of this medium. They for some reason assumed that every single person who downloaded a particular song, would have bought the CD if the song weren't available for free. Most wouldn't have of course. What's more, most would have never even heard the particular artist or the less radio-played pieces. They did not capitalize on the sheer volume of listener preference information and persecuted rather than supported their biggest fans - people willing to put in time, money and even risk that persecution to share music, films, anime.
ADV, to it's credit, suddenly realized that the very people that steal and distribute versions of their new series or films before these things are even out, for the most part aren't evil. They don't do it to hurt the company. Instead, here is a group of hard core fans, for whom the ability to see something "before it is out" via a not-so-user-friendly technology, is a huge marker of cool. It's a statement, a way to assert their dominance among peers. What happens when you give them something to play with that is legal? They love it! Just let them at it, they will write you reviews and help with distribution. They will build fan sites and contribute free advertising. Be nice to them, and they will be nice back to you. Try to scare them and they will steal your content, feel just as cool, and laugh at you. Word of mouth is the most powerful form of advertising - any marketer will tell you that none of the other forms come anywhere close to the power of human-to-human advice. The internet has made it possible to extend the number of people that can give you that advice. It is surprising the "culture industry" still hasn't figured out how to harness it. Until then - tech geeks 1/culture industry 0
02 August, 2005
London Suspect Betrayed by His Cellphone
26 July, 2005
Mind savers

Mind savers
Originally uploaded by xeeliz.
a friend on Flickr posted this picture from her recent transcontinental flight. "Can't fly without these now" she commented and tagged the photo "quiet". A recent NYT article about noise-cancelling headphones talks about a similar idea - there is too much external noise in our environments and it hurts to think. Sometimes, we need to technology to stop "alerting" or "entertaining" us, we need it to MAKE THINGS QUIET! Quiet is a privelege, a commodity. It has always been something difficult to achieve in many spaces and is becoming a rarity nearly everywhere. With the FCC trying so hard to permit cell phone use on planes, travellers look on in horror and reach for $200 noise-cancelling headphones if they can afford those. What I find curious, is the amount of push-back from the very consumers on behalf of which, supposedly, FCC is trying to remove the ban. Most want the ban in place, the LIKE the relative quiet of an airplane flight. It is unclear why the FCC thinks is to necessary to allow cell-phones in flight (even with Cingular suggesting it is not necessary and the CTIA being of two minds about it). It was rarely a burning issues, few people ever really pushed for it. Does FCC simply want to look like it's doing something important? This one seems at the expense of consumers, not to help them. Ah well... where are those noise-cancelling hedaphones? I gotta get myself a pair.
Russia’s Biggest Spammer Brutally Murdered in Apartment
25 July, 2005
Degrees of separation | Economist.com
22 July, 2005
Wireless operators charging consumers for unsolicitied messages?
What I find odd in both of these reports, is that Verizon wireless is conspicuously missing. Yet it is Verizon that still charges it's consumers for incoming text messages, unlike other companies. I have been waiting for a wide-scale complaint or a class-action suit regarding this (after all, you do not have a choice whether you want to receive a message or not - text messages and media messages arrive in your inbox and you are charged the appropriate amount regardless of whether they are read). Wireless operators have somehow gotten away with charging for incoming calls (on a technicality, really - they claimed that you know who is calling by the number that your phone recognizes and should be able to make the decision whether you want to pay for the call or not based on this information... yeah right) in the US (this is not the case in Europe for example). However, only Verizon Wireless has been charging for incoming text messages (at least as far as I am aware). At $.02 per message, the price is not high, yet I think it's the principle of the matter that really means something.
27 June, 2005
Paramount paranoia
this is rather entertaining. Paramount is determined to "beat the pirating plague" apparently. Yet, I wonder whether there is any merit to the idea that there is something to the modern version of the "word-o-mouth" advertising complete with video snippets? At the very least, Paramount made sure there was no snide-remark texting during the premier.