Toy Camera Phone Available in Japan
"Toy Camera Phone Available in Japan:
Just in time for the holiday season, Japanese toy manufacturer Tomy is unveiling a line of toy mobile phones, including ones with built in cameras. The toy devices cannot connect to a wireless network, but users can exchange photos via an IC card. The toy comes with a 64×48 pixel 100K CMOS camera and costs approximately $55.00. (Source: Cellular-News.com)"
I find it interesting that toy manufacturers are just now starting to catch up and come out with fairly realistic, almost functioning phones. Its amusing since this market niche is somewhat obvious, I would think. Reports of parents giving their phones to their kids as toys have been coming in for a few years now. My cousin's wife works for motorola and routinely brings outdated phones for her toddler to play with.
Here though, its something that looks like a phone but is, in actuality, simply a cheap camera. Which brings me to another point. Cell phones are first and foremost mediums for communication (dyadic communication especially). Every application so far that has had reports of high use has been some kind of augmentation to such communication (SMS, MMS, push-to-talk). Each with its own drawbacks and advantages, stuck together in a little piece of plastic that fits into a pocket or a purse. Yet cellphone manufacturers and providers seem to have all but forgotten about the social-network aspect of the phone - its essential and primary purpose. Instead they put myriad of options and function on the phones that have nothing to do with sociability: your calendar, to do list, games, video, camera...
Camera... in a way it IS a social technology, yet its marriage with the phone is a difficult one - its hard to use, the pictures are poor quality, its a toy, less functional than flashy. Then why is it that this new Japanese toy phone is essentially just a camera? I wonder what age group would be into using those? and why.
On the other hand, why is it that despite all this development of new hand-set options, so few of those options are social-network driven? At most, the new things are merely integrations of already exisitng technology into a more mobile device. Maybe desinging social technologies is too expensive and not always viable? hmmm curious.
